After successfully passing the BLS training, I can now proceed with the Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) training. During those 1 1/2 days, we were handled by 3 different ER physicians, and 1 anesthesiologist. Comparing to BLS, this is more difficult, more nerve-wracking, more stressful - more different algorithms to learn, more ECG tracings to identify, more drugs to give.
Prior to class, we were instructed to visit the website of AHA to read their supplementary discussions regarding ECG interpretation and pharmacology. They will not be discussed in class. Furthermore, we were also instructed to answer a pre-course evaluation, print the results, and submit it to class.
The class was already divided into two groups, alphabetically.
Day 1, July 7, 2011
2 to5:30 pm
More videos were shown and we still had practice sessions regarding Rescue Breathing, BLS Surveys. No surprise, there were practical exams regarding them, but they were all a "piece of cake" (since we just had our BLS hours ago). Unfortunately since we started late, we also finished later than planned. Plus, we weren't able to discuss Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS) as scheduled because we ran out of time. Prior to dismissal, we were all instructed to read our books, study the checklists (found at the appendix section) in preparation for the Megacode the following day.
I did try to read but I was distracted by something else, and it's not related to ACLS.
Day 2, July 8, 2011
8am to 7pm
I arrived at the place 30 minutes earlier. Everyone was talking about the Megacode, saying that they're unprepared because they just slept the entire night, they can't wait for the day to finish, blah blah blah. When we entered our classroom at quarter to 8, we saw that the mannequins, cardiac monitor, other equipment were ready. Gulp! It was going to be a loooonnggg day.
We met 2 different physicians - another ER physician and an anesthesiologist. One of them began to worry about our schedule since we failed to discuss ACS the previous day. Like a domino effect, the succeeding topics were adjusted as well. All of us bore the consequences - the discussions regarding the algorithms were fast, next thing we knew we were being tested individually as team leaders (but it wasn't graded). We were being criticised, corrected, reminded constantly.
My preparation for the course paid off - since most of our decisions, orders are based on correct ECG interpretations, I was able to go through the practice session well (when I was the team leader twice - cardiac arrest algorithm & arrhythmia algorithm). My groupmates had a hard time reading the ECG tracings that they kept on looking at me for answers or clues on what the tracing is. Ironically, some of them were physicians.
Thankfully, we had time "to put it all together" as a review before we went into the dreaded Megacode. We were given time for CR break, last few minutes to read our manuals. Then, it started.
My case was ok, but I had some flaws - my case was again Stable Tachycardia. I should've been lucky to get the same case twice but I screwed up. My instinct told me to do vagal maneuvers [when the QRS complex of the tracing went from regular-wide (I already gave adenosine 6mg) to regular-narrow] but I listened to my groupmate's whisper, telling me to give adenosine 12mg & I ended up doing that. Wrong! One cardinal rule - always follow your instinct. The other one was a SVT that was pulseless. I told the facilitator it was Pulseless VT and following the algorithm, I ordered for a shock. I was wrong again! It was PEA. I learned about my mistakes afterwards. I was able to see my paper and the remarks were high. Well, not bad but I'm not happy either because I felt I had an easier case, compared to the others. I had no excuse for messing up.
After the megacode, we weren't done yet. We still had the written exam to take. The rule was to obtain a score of at least 42 (or 84%) out of 50. Otherwise, you'll have to undergo remediation with 1 of the facilitators. I was the first to finish and I got exactly 42. Whew! It was more difficult than the BLS exam, because it asked questions all the way from the previous day's topics & it involved cases. Among 12, only 3 students (myself included) didn't had to go through remediation. We graduated from the course ahead of the others, claimed our IDs and certificates, and left the place; while the others have to wait more, go through remediation before they can get their IDs and certificates (if the facilitator is satisfied). I observed that if most of my classmates were prepared for this, we would've gone home earlier.
Once again, we were told to answer a course evaluation for the ACLS. Just like yesterday, I gave the course high remarks.
With regards to the current AHA guidelines, they are more simpler, easier to understand. There are major, major changes and it will take awhile for those changes to sink in & be actually applied. I just hope that everyone, physicians and non-physicians alike, will be able to apply it & be able to save lives.